Glossary
BIMI
Brand Indicators for Message Identification is a specification that lets a domain publish a logo, which participating mailbox providers may display beside messages that pass authentication. It is not a security mechanism and confers no delivery advantage: it is a visual indicator available only to domains that already enforce DMARC. Several providers additionally require a verified mark certificate, which is a paid attestation that the logo is genuinely yours.
What it requires
A DMARC policy of `quarantine` or `reject`, applied to the whole domain rather than a fraction. A monitoring-only policy does not qualify.
A logo in SVG Tiny Portable/Secure form — a restricted SVG profile with no scripting, no external references and a square aspect ratio — served over HTTPS.
A TXT record at `default._bimi.example.com` naming the logo's URL, and optionally the certificate's.
For several major providers, a verified mark certificate issued by one of a small number of authorities, which requires a registered trademark for the logo.
The record name matters: `default._bimi` is the selector used when a message carries no BIMI selector header, and it is the one nearly every deployment needs.
What a verified mark certificate is
A certificate attesting that the organisation named holds rights to the logo, typically evidenced by a trademark registration in a recognised jurisdiction.
It is issued by a small set of authorities, costs a meaningful annual sum, and requires the trademark to exist before the application.
Some providers display a BIMI logo without one; others require it. Support differs, and it changes over time.
A common indicator certificate exists as a lower-cost alternative without a trademark requirement, with correspondingly narrower provider support.
What it does and does not do
It makes authenticated mail from the domain visually distinguishable in inboxes that support it, which is a recognition benefit rather than a technical one.
It does not improve deliverability. The DMARC enforcement it requires may, but that is the prerequisite doing the work, not BIMI.
It does not authenticate anything additional. A message displaying a BIMI logo passed DMARC, which it would have done anyway.
It is displayed at the discretion of each mailbox provider, and a correct configuration may simply not appear in some clients.
It is worth being clear about the order of causation, because it is frequently reversed in marketing material: enforcing DMARC is what protects the domain, and BIMI is a consequence of having done it.
How to check it
`dig default._bimi.example.com TXT +short` shows whether a record is published and what it points at.
Fetch the logo URL and confirm it is served over HTTPS with a valid certificate and the correct restricted SVG profile. An ordinary SVG will be rejected.
Confirm the DMARC policy first with `dig _dmarc.example.com TXT +short`; a policy of `none` makes everything else moot.
Send a message to accounts at the providers you care about. Display is the only real test, and it varies by provider and by account type.
Frequently asked questions
- Does BIMI improve email deliverability?
- No. The DMARC enforcement it requires can, but BIMI itself is a display feature and carries no delivery weight.
- Do I need a verified mark certificate?
- Several major providers require one, and it requires a registered trademark. Others display a logo without it, and support changes over time.
- Why is my BIMI logo not showing?
- Common causes are a DMARC policy of none, an SVG outside the required restricted profile, or a provider that does not display logos for that account type.
Sources
Related
VeriFixScan crawls a site and applies its checks to every page it reaches, keeping the evidence behind each finding. Scanning one website is free.
Scan a website