Glossary

BIMI

Brand Indicators for Message Identification is a specification that lets a domain publish a logo, which participating mailbox providers may display beside messages that pass authentication. It is not a security mechanism and confers no delivery advantage: it is a visual indicator available only to domains that already enforce DMARC. Several providers additionally require a verified mark certificate, which is a paid attestation that the logo is genuinely yours.

What it requires

A DMARC policy of `quarantine` or `reject`, applied to the whole domain rather than a fraction. A monitoring-only policy does not qualify.

A logo in SVG Tiny Portable/Secure form — a restricted SVG profile with no scripting, no external references and a square aspect ratio — served over HTTPS.

A TXT record at `default._bimi.example.com` naming the logo's URL, and optionally the certificate's.

For several major providers, a verified mark certificate issued by one of a small number of authorities, which requires a registered trademark for the logo.

The record name matters: `default._bimi` is the selector used when a message carries no BIMI selector header, and it is the one nearly every deployment needs.

What a verified mark certificate is

A certificate attesting that the organisation named holds rights to the logo, typically evidenced by a trademark registration in a recognised jurisdiction.

It is issued by a small set of authorities, costs a meaningful annual sum, and requires the trademark to exist before the application.

Some providers display a BIMI logo without one; others require it. Support differs, and it changes over time.

A common indicator certificate exists as a lower-cost alternative without a trademark requirement, with correspondingly narrower provider support.

What it does and does not do

It makes authenticated mail from the domain visually distinguishable in inboxes that support it, which is a recognition benefit rather than a technical one.

It does not improve deliverability. The DMARC enforcement it requires may, but that is the prerequisite doing the work, not BIMI.

It does not authenticate anything additional. A message displaying a BIMI logo passed DMARC, which it would have done anyway.

It is displayed at the discretion of each mailbox provider, and a correct configuration may simply not appear in some clients.

It is worth being clear about the order of causation, because it is frequently reversed in marketing material: enforcing DMARC is what protects the domain, and BIMI is a consequence of having done it.

How to check it

`dig default._bimi.example.com TXT +short` shows whether a record is published and what it points at.

Fetch the logo URL and confirm it is served over HTTPS with a valid certificate and the correct restricted SVG profile. An ordinary SVG will be rejected.

Confirm the DMARC policy first with `dig _dmarc.example.com TXT +short`; a policy of `none` makes everything else moot.

Send a message to accounts at the providers you care about. Display is the only real test, and it varies by provider and by account type.

Frequently asked questions

Does BIMI improve email deliverability?
No. The DMARC enforcement it requires can, but BIMI itself is a display feature and carries no delivery weight.
Do I need a verified mark certificate?
Several major providers require one, and it requires a registered trademark. Others display a logo without it, and support changes over time.
Why is my BIMI logo not showing?
Common causes are a DMARC policy of none, an SVG outside the required restricted profile, or a provider that does not display logos for that account type.

Sources

Related

VeriFixScan crawls a site and applies its checks to every page it reaches, keeping the evidence behind each finding. Scanning one website is free.

Scan a website